The ARB Competency Framework: Understanding the New Outcomes
ARB's new Competency Outcomes framework underpins all the education reforms. This guide explains the five competency areas, how they are assessed, and what they mean for architectural education.
The ARB Competency Outcomes framework defines what a newly registered architect must be able to do. Understanding this framework is essential for navigating the education reforms.
The Five Competency Areas
1. Contextual and Architectural Knowledge
Encompasses understanding of:
- Diverse global, cultural, social, technological, and economic contexts
- Building technology and environmental systems
- The role of architects in society
- Principles of sustainability, safety, and inclusive design
2. Design
Focuses on:
- Preparing and presenting architectural designs of varying scales
- Critical and creative design approaches
- Integrating artistic and technical aspects
- Considering environmental, social, and user needs
3. Research and Evaluation
Involves:
- Using research techniques appropriately
- Engaging with clients and stakeholders
- Evaluating architectural precedents
- Applying relevant legislation and regulations
- Critically assessing knowledge sources
4. Management Practice and Leadership
Covers:
- Principles of sustainable, responsible, and ethical practice
- Financial and resource management
- Project management from inception to completion
- Contract administration
- Risk management
- Effective communication with all stakeholders
5. Professionalism and Ethics
Emphasises:
- Adherence to the Architects Code
- Commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion
- Working constructively in teams
- Upholding health and safety obligations
- Environmental responsibility
- Recognising duties of care
Assessment Levels
Each outcome is assessed at different levels, adapted from Miller's Triangle:
Knowledge (Knows): Sufficient grounding to understand importance and relevance.
Understanding (Knows How): Ability to apply knowledge in limited, managed situations.
Ability (Shows How): Demonstration of capabilities in authentic or simulated situations.
Performance (Does/Is): Consistent and independent performance in complex professional situations.
Academic qualifications typically assess to the "Ability" level, while practice qualifications assess to the "Performance" level.
How This Differs from Previous Criteria
The previous system used General Criteria and Graduate Attributes to define what should be taught. The new Competency Outcomes focus on what candidates should be able to do, with greater emphasis on:
- Building safety and fire safety competence (post-Grenfell)
- Ethical practice and professional conduct
- Sustainability and environmental responsibility
- Inclusive design and accessibility
- Digital competence and emerging technologies
Implications for Students
Academic Study: Your learning will be designed to help you demonstrate these outcomes. Assessment methods may evolve to focus on competency demonstration rather than just knowledge recall.
Practical Experience: Your workplace experience should provide opportunities to develop and demonstrate the Practice Outcomes. The new Record of Competency will map directly to these outcomes.
Self-Assessment: Understanding the framework helps you identify gaps in your development and seek appropriate experience and learning opportunities.